MICK Jagger has blasted Paul McCartney’s claim that The Beatles were bigger than The Rolling Stones. Macca suggested the Fab Four were slicker singers and that the Stones copied their style in the ’60s.
But Sir Mick pointed to his band’s huge stadium success. He added: “There’s obviously no competition. “He (Paul) is a sweetheart.
I’m a politician. “The big difference, though, is that The Rolling Stones is a big concert band in other decades and other areas when The Beatles never even did an arena tour. “They broke up before the touring business started for real…(in around 1969).” Sir Paul, 77, recently told DJ Howard Stern’s radio show: “I love the Stones but The Beatles were better. “Their stuff is rooted in the blues. “Whereas we had a.