WEST PALM BEACH, Fla. - A federal judge Thursday appeared to give a boost to former President Donald Trump’s hopes for appointing an outside legal expert to review government records seized by the FBI, questioning the Justice Department’s arguments that Trump couldn’t make the request and that it would needlessly delay its investigation."Ultimately, what is the harm" in such an appointment, U.S.
District Judge Aileen Cannon asked department lawyers. But she did not rule on the request, saying she would do so later.RELATED: Trump FBI search: DOJ files on possible 'special master' appointment for Mar-a-Lago docsLawyers for Trump say the appointment of a special master is necessary to ensure an independent inspection of the documents seized by the FBI during the Aug.
8 search of Mar-a-Lago.This kind of review, they say, would allow for "highly personal information" such as diaries or journals to be separated from the investigation and returned to Trump, along with any other documents that may be protected by claims of attorney-client privilege or executive privilege.Chris Kise, a Trump lawyer and former Florida solicitor general, told Cannon that appointing a neutral party would restore public faith in the investigation."This is an unprecedented situation.
We need to lower the temperature," Kise said. "We need to take a deep breath."RELATED: Redacted affidavit in Trump’s Mar-a-Lago search released by Justice DepartmentFormer President Donald Trump leaves Trump Tower to meet with New York Attorney General Letitia James for a civil investigation on August 10, 2022 in New York City.