Kate Middleton cancer conspiracy theories run wild as royal reporter suggests she only had ‘pre-cancerous cells’

was cancer-free in September, six months after she confirmed she was undergoing chemotherapy treatment for her diagnosis.However, conspiracists are now suggesting Middleton may not had cancer at all.

The theories point to what was said in a resurfaced report from September by Sky News senior royal editor Rhiannon Mills.Mills, an accredited royal reporter, wrote about Middleton’s announcement that she was cancer-free at the time.“In March the princess confirmed that pre-cancerous cells had been found following abdominal surgery and that she would have to undergo a course of preventative chemotherapy,” said Mills.The phrase “pre-cancerous cells” created doubt about Middleton’s condition — especially because of Mills’ respected reputation with the British media.

According to The Daily Beast, Mills is a member of the so-called royal rota, a quasi-official group of royal journalists working for British media who frequently cooperate with the palace.However, the palace never corrected the “pre-cancerous cells” part of Mills’ report, thus giving credence to the theories about Middleton.A doctor told The Daily Beast, “You either have pre-cancerous cells or you have cancer, the two terms are not interchangeable.”British commentator Narinder Kaur is among those who have drawn attention to the cancer conspiracy.Kaur wrote on X, “I don’t know if she had cancer or pre cancer cells.

But either way…I’ve been attacked in the most vicious way. Just because I asked why she looked aged. Just THAT.”The Post has reached out to Kensington Palace for comment.Middleton announced her diagnosis in March, two months after undergoing “major abdominal surgery” at the London Clinic.